If you are a reviewer, please login to review
2015 / Tulsa, OK / Budget
Municipal budget at a high level (e.g. planned budget by unit of appropriation with a programmatic description of each unit of appropriation). This category is about budgets which are plans for expenditure (not actual expenditure in the past). (More info)
- Status: pending
- Submission date: 4:45pm on 22nd Feb 2015
- Submitter: Jeremy Satterfield
- Reviewer: Jeremy Satterfield
Please read first
Please review this submission carefully as we have updated the guidance around what each dataset refers to and the data availability question explanations.
1. Official data sources
Please answer regarding official (government or government associated) sources of data. Often data is available from various sources both official and unofficial but we only want answers on the basis of official sources.
To illustrate: suppose election results data is available both from government sources and from a third party website and that the government data is in PDF (so not machine readable) but that the unofficial source has the data in spreadsheets (machine-readable). Then the answer to the machine readable question would be 'No' as the official source is not machine readable (but please do list the unofficial source in the details and comments section).
2. Provide evidence
Please try to provide relevant evidence to back up responses. For example, if data is public and online the URL field should not be empty, or, if the data is openly licensed there should be information (e.g. link) for relevant license of terms-of-use in the details.
3. Assessment Point
Questions should be answered on the basis of the situation as of today. Do not answer based on what may happen in the future (or the situation previously). So, for example, if data will be online soon but is not online now the answer to the 'online' question should be 'No' (though please mention that it will be available in the details and comments section).
Commentscomments powered by Disqus